Worse than an Infidel

April 9, 2012

  1 Timothy 5:8   But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.

The Incredible Scofield and His Book by Joseph M. Canfield


Joseph M. Canfield’s thorough, critical review of the legends and historical inaccuracies about Cyrus Scofield and the Scofield Reference Bible (and later editions revised by others) included extensive documentation relating to Scofield’s divorce of his first wife and of his failure to provide for his daughters.  Canfield observed that you will not find any Scofield Reference Notes (1917 Edition) for 1 Timothy 5:8 and for many other verses relating to Scofield’s personal failings.  Even worse, Scofield’s notes have promoted dispensationalism and other false teachings used to promote endless wars and the destruction of Christianity.

As a boy, I bought a Scofield Reference Bible because of its cross-referencing system.  This system meant that I did not need to carry with me a Bible and a concordance.  Luckily, I ignored Scofield’s notes and Ussher dates as being only opinons.  Unfortunately, many Christians assumed that anything appearing in a Bible was sacred.

Scofield’s Qualifications


Scofield claimed to have a Doctor of Divinity degree and used the title Dr. Scofield.  However, researchers have been unable to verify any studies or any degree.  Scofield did not study the languages of the Bible.  Born in Michigan, Scofield moved to Tennessee, where he served in the Confederate Army during part of the Civil War (War Between the States).  In Kansas, he was a lawyer, a member of the Kansas House of Representatives, and a United States Attorney for Kansas.  He spent time in jail for fraud.



Scofield’s first wife came from a prosperous fur-trading family.  He spent long periods of time away from his wife and daughters.  Later, when he decided to enter the ministry, he divorced his Catholic wife and married a woman who attended his church.

Free from the Law by Grace


Instead of advocating a straight and narrow path of moral behavior, Scofield promoted antinomianism.  Since people can never be perfect, the saved are free from the law by grace.

Failing Churches


Scofield claimed that Christian churches were failing in a decaying world.  However, if there will be a rapture soon, why bother to improve?

Avoid Politics


Even though Scofield had held political positions, he advocated that Christians stay out of politics because the world cannot be converted.  While he supported having missionaries, his advocacy was based upon evangelizing, not on ultimate conversions.  Powerful political elites will appreciate not having to worry about Christians who stay out of politics.



Scofield must have been surprised on his death bed because he claimed to believe in the rapture.  He wrote extensive notes about Matthew 13 and the Parable of the Wheat and Tares (weeds, used to refer to wicked people).  In this parable, Jesus spoke of burning the tares first and placing the wheat in the barn.  Scofield twisted this to meaning set aside the tares for later destruction and take the wheat first.  Hal Lindsey and others have sold millions of books based upon Scofield’s notes and other proponents of dispensationalism, such as:  The Late Great Planet Earth, The Rapture, and The Everlasting Hatred: The Roots of Jihad.

Millennial Kingdom on Earth


While Scofield promoted the Postponed Kingdom theory, he provided few notes to the Bible to support the theory.  Jesus disappointed those who wanted a Messiah to rule the world.  Canfield critiqued the theory that Jesus will return to impose political or theocratic rule for 1,000 years and yet many will choose not to believe during that period.

Scofield’s Expensive Lifestyle


Canfield documented Scofield’s earnings as a minister and his royalties.  Scofield could not have made trips to Europe and have lived in several homes on his income.  Scofield was a member of The Lotos Club in New York City.  Neither his wealth nor his literary achievements were similar to those of other members of this expensive club.  Hopefully, future researchers will be able to discover the sources and the agenda of those who promoted the works of Scofield.

Peace or Endless Wars?


Scofield’s views ranged from having a world government and world police to Armageddon prospects for endless wars.

Words Have Consequences


Canfield provided detailed explanations of the errors and omissions in an earlier book about Scofield (The Life Story of C. I. Scofield by Charles Gallaudet Trumbull), a thesis, and in articles.  Charles Carlson has posted more recent critiques of Scofield and of the Scofield Reference Bible.  After comparing these sources, readers will be able to decide whether Scofield rightly divided the word of truth:

  2 Timothy 2:15   Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.

Charles Carlson, We Hold These Truths


The Incredible Scofield and His Book



A Prize from Fairyland beyond our Wildest Dreams

January 24, 2012

As an American, I am very experienced with living in a country with dishonest major media (called the lamestream media by many Americans) owned by a small number of corporations or financed partially by the American government. The combination of the dishonest media and of the dumbing down of American education has consequences. See, for example, the film Idiocracy for a forecast of the future. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBvIweCIgwk

In George Orwell’s book 1984, Orwell predicted a future with competing totalitarian empires controlling the media and revising history. As George Galloway, a former Member of Parliament and the host of some excellent programs on Press TV, commented recently, you can still find Speakers’ Corner in Hyde Park, London and in some other locations in the United Kingdom because the political establishment knows that very few people will be able to hear the speakers.

In “Press TV Discredits Itself” (Huffington Post UK, January 24, 2012), Jody Sabral has abandoned support for an outstanding media organization, for which she worked in Turkey.
Sabral’s claims of free speech in Britain are laughable. Many people in the world remember the BBC’s coverage (or lack of coverage) of the Gaza War. In “BBC refuses airtime to Gaza aid appeal” (The Guardian, January 22, 2009), Jenny Percival noted that the BBC has been criticized in the past over alleged biases in covering the Middle East. The BBC refused to air humanitarian appeals to aid the victims in Gaza. Previously, the Disasters Emergency Committee (DEC) had been able to raise millions of pounds for relief in Congo and in Burma. Sky offered this excuse for failing to broadcast the Gaza appeal: ‘By convention, if all broadcasters do not carry the appeal, then none do. The decision was effectively made for us.’
Are these British values that Sabral wants others to applaud? While Sabral and I share having American ancestors who served in the American Revolution and ancestors from England, the similarities end there. My Foote ancestors left England nearly 400 years ago. Many people left England and other European countries centuries ago to escape from monarchy, theocracy, and from endless wars. Centuries later, the British still have a monarchy, a theocracy, and support for endless wars to steal resources from weaker countries.
In “Why Iran hates Britain so much” (The Telegraph, June 29, 2009), Con Coughlin noted:
“Relations further soured when Britain arbitrarily set Iran’s borders with India in the 1860s, but matters came to a head in 1872 when the then shah awarded Baron Paul Julius von Reuter, the founder of Reuters news agency, a monopoly over virtually all of Iran’s economic and financial resources. Lord Curzon, the British Foreign Secretary at the time, described the ‘Reuter Concession’, as it became known, as ‘the most complete and extraordinary surrender of the entire industrial resources of a kingdom into foreign hands that has probably ever been dreamt of, much less accomplished, in history’.

Coughlin failed to note that Lord Curzon went on to become the architect of the D’Arcy Concession, a comparable concession in Persia. Stephen Kinzer, in All The Shah’s Men, wrote: “Winston Churchill called it ‘a prize from fairyland beyond our wildest dreams’.”


For honest accounts of the role of Britain in Persia, read W. Morgan Shuster’s book, The Strangling of Persia.

Shuster’s book contains the details of a small group of Americans who went to Persia to help with the Persian desires for a constitutional revolution. Unfortunately, the Russian and British monarchies were able to crush the efforts of the honest American individuals. The result was the continuation of monarchy in Iran with the Pahlavi Dynasty. The people of the world should be applauding the Islamic Republic of Iran for ending monarchy in Iran and for preventing the Iranian Communist MEK (MKO, PMOI, NCRI, Rajavi Cult, or Pol Pot of Iran) terrorists from taking over Iran. Like the United Kingdom, the Islamic Republic of Iran is a theocracy. When will the United Kingdom set an example for other theocracies in the world by ending theocracy and monarchy in the United Kingdom?

Unfortunately, the thieves of Britain are joined today by the thieves of America: Zionists, Christian Zionists, and Neo-Conservatives (Neo-Trotskyites).

George Galloway, a former Member of Parliament and the host of programs on Press TV, has expressed views contrary to Sabral’s views. Other members of Parliament or former members of Parliament have hosted programs on Press TV in London. Sabral failed to address the views of these British lawmakers and failed to explain why her understanding of British laws is superior to theirs.

I have appeared in the London studio of Press TV on a panel (including with a Zionist) for one hour. Our only instructions were to discuss, in our own views, what we thought were the most significant events in the world for that year. To suggest that anyone in Tehran approves the content of programs is very dishonest. No one at Press TV knew which points I and the other panelists wanted to make. Viewers witnessed an honest difference in viewpoints between persons they would not see on the BBC propaganda network.

I have appeared many times on Press TV and several times on China Radio International and on RT (Russia Today Television). I do not expect any invitations for me or anyone with Middle East experiences similar to mine on BBC or on America’s lamestream media. Other than the taped television program in London, my appearances on Press TV have been live. My appearances have ranged from a few minutes to several continuous hours on live television. No one at Press TV knew what I would say.

By contrast, you will find in America’s book stores and on the American media the views on Iran of people who have never been to Iran and who have not studied Persian. For example, see Kenneth M. Pollack’s book, The Persian Puzzle.


The BBC Persian Service even promotes the views of the Iranian Communist MEK (MKO, PMOI, NCRI, Rajavi Cult, or Pol Pot of Iran) terrorists.


These are British values others should hold in contempt.

Even the New York Times, with its long history to promoting dishonestly communists, described the MEK honestly as the Cult of Rajavi.


In 2008, as a presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton threatened to obliterate Iran.

Sabral failed to condemn Hillary Clinton for wanting to murder every man, woman, and child in Iran. She failed to condemn the long British history of using military force to impose dictators in other countries and to steal resources. Instead, according to Sabral, those of us who appear on Press TV to oppose the bombing of Iran or sanctions against Iran are anti-interventionalist propagandists.

Sabral has even worked for Press TV. Press TV is one of the best sources of news and programs in the world today. However, even Press TV has made at least one mistake in its hiring of journalists.

I am grateful that my Foote ancestors left England nearly 400 years ago. Today, the United Kingdom is still a monarchy, a theocracy, and a promoter of endless wars to steal resources from weaker countries. While my family name is English, I welcome being classified as unBritish. If the British truly valued democracy, they would have granted seats in Parliament to representatives from the American colonies. There would have been no American Revolution.
If the British people had any good values, they would have supported the values of Charles James Fox, a Member of Parliament at that time.


Instead, the British people supported the laws which gave them King George III, the Mad King, or the King Who Lost America.

George Orwell, in his book 1984, had a better appreciation of the failings of real British values.

From 1906 to 1911, the people of Iran struggled to have a constitutional revolution. They valued democracy. The Russian and British monarchies crushed the dreams of the Iranian people.

Today, the British are still mired in monarchy and in theocracy. Sabral claims that the British value democracy. For educated persons who have studied history, we know that it was the Iranian people who valued democracy.

America’s Lamestream Media

January 20, 2012


Paul Sheldon Foote




January 19, 2012


The American mainstream media has become so bad that many people refer to it as the lamestream media.



As an American who has lived and worked in the Middle East, North Africa, Europe, and in Asia, I have years of experience with being able to compare what Americans were learning about foreign countries from the American media with what was really happening in those countries.  Unfortunately, millions of Americans who have not lived and worked overseas continue to rely upon America’s mainstream media.  Their beliefs in lies results in endless wars, deaths, and in the economic decline of America.  Everyone is responsible for seeking the most accurate sources of information.  No one should be consuming the slop of lies served at the troughs of the American mainstream media.


Accuracy In Media (AIM) and Kenneth R. Timmerman


Even worse, there are television programs and websites claiming to monitor the accuracy of American media.  For example, Accuracy In Media (AIM) has published on January 9, 2012: “Tehran TV Loves Ron Paul” by Kenneth R. Timmerman.  This should become a case study in future books and courses on the inaccuracies of America’s lamestream media and of media watchdogs.




Timmerman has attacked Press TV (http://www.presstv.ir) for its use of American politicians, self-declared political analysts, and experts.  Timmerman failed to note my academic credentials, my position as a professor, and my international working experiences.  He failed to note, also, my appearances in media other than Press TV:  China Radio International (CRI) (http://english.cri.cn/) and RT (Russia Today Television) (http://rt.com/).  How can I be an expert on CRI and on RT but not on Press TV?  I have lived and worked in Iran, including working at the American Embassy in Tehran.  My wife of 43 years is an Iranian.  How dare Timmerman question the credentials of the guests on Press TV?  Has Timmerman ever visited Iran?  Why should anyone believe anything that Timmerman writes about Iran or about the Middle East?  I am a professor with degrees from The University of Michigan, Harvard Business School, and from Michigan State University.  I studied Persian at Harvard University.  For Timmerman’s academic credentials, see the links below.


Who says that Timmerman is an expert on any subject?  The Israel Unity Coalition says so:


“In 1982, Timmerman was taken hostage by terrorists in Lebanon, and spent 24 days in an underground cell under constant aerial and artillery bombardment.”




While the Israel Unity Coalition claims that Timmerman has been an investigative reporter, the organization does not reveal employers or other sources of income.


For better reviews of Timmerman’s credentials and writings, see:








Neo-Conservative (Neo-Trotskyite) Chickenhawks


Has Timmerman ever visited Iran?  Does he speak Persian?  Why does Timmerman have no military service?


For a list of many American politicians who are chickenhawks, see:



Why do the neo-conservatives (neo-Trotskyites) support endless wars, the bankrupting of America, and the deaths of American soldiers but not serve in the military?




While I was an officer in the American Army in Vietnam, I would not recommend any American family to send sons and daughters to die in endless Zionist wars.  America’s worst enemies are in America:  Zionists, Christian Zionists, and Neo-Conservatives (Neo-Trotskyites).


Ron Paul


Press TV does interview many guests who are Ron Paul supporters.


In July 2003, Congressman Ron Paul (Republican—Texas) warned about the neo-Conservatives (neo-Trotskyites) with “We’ve Been Neo-Conned”.



Americans who trust America’s lamestream media have paid with lives and money for their ignorant support of Zionist wars.


In Ron Paul’s 2008 and 2012 presidential campaigns, I have supported and contributed to the campaigns.  As a lifelong Republican, I shall vote for only Ron Paul in 2012.  The other Republican candidates are not real Republicans.  As a student at The University of Michigan in the 1960’s, I worked on the campaign for governor of Governor George Romney.  Today, I cannot support Mitt Romney.


Neo-Conservatives are Neo-Troskyites


Timmerman fails to explain to persons who claim to be conservatives that Neo-Conservatives are Neo-Trotskyites.  The term neo-conservative is a derogatory term created by communists who understood how the admirers of Trotsky were infiltrating the Democratic and Republican parties by pretending to be anti-communists.  Admirers of Trotsky are anti-Stalin, not anti-communist.  For details, read:


The Transparent Cabal: The Neoconservative Agenda, War in the Middle East, and the National Interest of Israel by Stephen J. Sniegoski




You may listen to Justin Raimondo explaining how communists became Republicans at:



Anyone who claims to be a Republican who supports neo-Conservatives is an example of the success of America’s lamestream media.


See, also, the film Idiocracy.



Iran is not an existential threat to Israel


Even half-truths are lies.  Timmerman’s highly selective quotations are extremely dishonest.  Tamir Pardo, Mossad chief, in the Israeli publication Haaretz, disagrees with Timmerman’s views.




Rick Santorum and the Iranian Communist MEK Terrorists


Timmerman noted that Press TV was critical of Rick Santorum.  Timmerman failed to disclose that for years he was a very prolific writer of articles attacking the Iranian Communist MEK (MKO, PMOI, NCRI, Rajavi Cult, or Pol Pot of Iran) terrorists.  For example, on January 24, 2003, he criticized the New York Times for running a full-page advertisement supporting these communist terrorists.  Timmerman noted:


“The ad included photographs of six of the 150 members of Congress who allegedly had signed a recent statement of support for the MEK. Top billing went to Florida Republican Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, who circulated the pro-MEK letter among her congressional colleagues. She and others have signed previous letters of support for the group.”


“Also appearing were Reps. Tom Tancredo (R-Colo.), Bob Filner (D-Calif.), Edolphus Towns (D-N.Y.), Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) and Lincoln Diaz-Balart (R-Fla.).”


‘Gray Lady’ Runs Ad for Terrorists

Daily Insight – Jan. 24, 2003



Timmerman failed to disclose that he knows me.  In the past, I have exchanged emails and telephone calls with Timmerman about the MEK terrorists.  At my request, Timmerman met with Michael Giorgino, a Republican candidate for Congress opposing Congressman Bob Filner (Democrat—California, MEK supporter, and son of a communist party candidate for Congress).


In one telephone conversation, I asked Timmerman why he had reduced the number of articles he was writing about the MEK.  I told him that there had been numerous opportunities to write articles since American and coalition forces attacked Camp Ashraf, Iraq in March 2003.  He claimed that editors were not interested in the MEK anymore.


In September 2005, Timmerman spoke at an Iranian monarchist demonstration in New York City.  He wrote an article explaining how the MEK pays large amounts of money for demonstrators.



To my shock, Timmerman started writing in support of the Iran Freedom Support Act (sponsored by Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, MEK supporter).  In addition, he wrote approvingly of Senator Rick Santorum, an MEK supporter who wanted to provide funding for Iranian “pro-democracy” groups.  There is nothing democratic about the Pol Pot of Iran.




For details about the MEK, see:






Timmerman should have been writing articles condemning Santorum as a traitor for supporting the MEK.  Instead, Timmerman is critical of Press TV for negative reporting about Santorum.


How many Americans have even heard of the MEK in America’s lamestream media?  How many Americans know that America’s State Department placed the MEK on the terrorist list during the administration of former President Bill Clinton?  How many Americans know that American soldiers have died taking these communist terrorists on shopping trips from Camp Ashraf, Iraq to Baghdad?  How many Americans know that the American government uses the MEK and other terrorist organizations to commit terrorist activities?


If you know these details, it is unlikely that you learned this from America’s lamestream media.  Sometimes, you can find the truth in America’s lamestream media:


The Cult of Rajavi

Published: July 13, 2003



Holocaust and Genocide Denial Laws


Timmerman claimed that I promote Holocaust deniers.   Anyone who wants to monitor the accuracy of Timmerman’s claims may request being my friend at Facebook:




I do post articles relating to Holocaust and genocide denial laws.  I am opposed to totalitarian thought police laws and penalties.






Sir Gerald Kaufman, a Jewish member of the British parliament and Zionist who lost relatives in the Holocaust, has described Israel as acting like Nazis in Gaza.



See, also, the writings of True Torah Jews who have lost relatives in the Holocaust but who oppose Zionism and who have met with political leaders in Iran.



Instead of denying holocausts and genocides, there should be more research.  For example, who was responsible for the Armenian genocide in Turkey?



By Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Enlarged Second Edition

Complete 575 page book is available

by clicking here for the free PDF file (3.8 MB)




Who was responsible for the murders of tens of millions of Christians in the Soviet Union?


Sever Plocker  


Stalin’s Jews

We mustn’t forget that some of greatest murderers of modern times were Jewish



Everyone needs to know more about genocides, not less.

Zionism is Communism


Zionist writers fail to disclose that Zionism is Communism.  Moses Hess, nicknamed the Communist Rabbi by early Marxists, helped Karl Marx write The Communist Manifesto.  Hess wrote a book proposing Zionism:  Rome and Jerusalem.  Free copies of this 1862 book are available online:




For an analysis of Zionism and Communism, read:

Moses Hess: Prophet of Communism and Zionism [Paperback]

Shlomo Avineri (Author)




For the truth about Christian Zionism, see:



American Demons

November 15, 2011

American Demons

Paul Sheldon Foote

November 13, 2011

In 2003, at the start of the Iraq War, Anne Singleton published Saddam’s Private Army, a book warning the world about the Iranian MEK (MKO, PMOI, NCRI, Rajavi Cult, or Pol Pot of Iran) terrorists at Camp Ashraf, Iraq. In 2011, as the deadline for the departure of American military forces approaches, Anne Singleton and her husband, Massoud Khodabandeh, have published The Life of Camp Ashraf, a book warning that there could be a tragic ending, similar to the Jonestown, Guyana mass suicides in 1978 or the Waco, Texas massacre in 1993, for thousands of cult members who want to leave the cult.

As former MEK members, the authors have spent years attempting to rescue the thousands of members trying to escape from Camp Ashraf, Iraq. They have visited Iraq and have helped the Nejat Society, the Sahar Family Foundation, and individuals who have escaped from Camp Ashraf.

Founded in 1965, the original purpose of the MEK was to use Marxist liberation theology to overthrow the Shah of Iran. After the Shah killed the founders, Massoud Rajavi took control of the terrorist organization. Shortly before the Shah fled from Iran, Massoud Khodabandeh met Ayatollah Khomeini in France to pledge the MEK’s support for the Iranian Revolution. During the American hostage crisis, the MEK participated and called for the executions of the Americans. Rajavi is anti-American, anti-imperialist, and anti-capitalist. His aim is to become the Pol Pot of Iran, even if the MEK must become a tool of the American government to achieve his aim. After Rajavi failed in a counter-revolution attempt against Ayatollah Khomeini, Rajavi fled to France. Massoud Khodabandeh attended a meeting between the CIA and Rajavi in France. The French government provided land, buildings, equipment, and approximately 200 free telephone lines for the terrorists. The MEK continues to operate a headquarters in France.

In 1983, Donald Rumsfeld, President Ronald Reagan’s envoy to Saddam Hussein arranged to move the MEK to Iraq. In the isolation of Camp Ashraf, Iraq, Rajavi turned the group into a cult. Some American feminists have promoted the MEK because Rajavi placed women in the leadership positions. The feminists fail to mention that candidates for the Leadership Council danced naked in front of Rajavi at “Freedom Dance” events and slept with Rajavi in the audition process. Feminists fail to mention also Rajavi’s cult practices of mandatory divorces, sending away children, prohibited contact with relatives, and arranged marriages.

After the Iran-Iraq War, the MEK hid more than 1,000 Iranian prisoners of war from the International Committee of the Red Cross to prevent the exchange of the Iranian prisoners.

In return for providing military camps and arms in Iraq, Saddam Hussein required the MEK to kill Iraqis. While Saddam Hussein’s Republican Guard forces trained by killing and eating innocent Iraqis, the MEK trained by killing and eating wild dogs. The MEK killed large numbers of unarmed Iraqi Kurd and Shiite civilians after the 1991 Gulf War. America did not attack MEK bases in Iraq. The West offered to move the MEK to Azerbaijan or to Pakistan.

In 2001, Massoud Rajavi rejoiced at the destruction of the World Trade Center.

At the start of the Iraq War, American and coalition forces killed some of the MEK. However, neo-conservatives (neo-Trotskyites) protected the MEK claiming falsely that the Fourth Geneva Convention applied to a terrorist group. The American military has been hiding and protecting Massoud Rajavi. The American government has prevented the inspection of a mass grave at Camp Ashraf (containing perhaps large numbers of Kuwaitis).

Contrary to lies of American military officers and to the American government’s claim of a war on terrorism, the American government has been using the MEK in terrorist activities in Iraq, Iran, and in Pakistan. The Iraqi government has proof in the form of MEK identifications issued by the American government found on the bodies of killed terrorists. The MEK has worked with other terrorist organizations in the region, including PJAK (or PEJAK) and Jundallah (or Jondollah).

In June 2003, after the French government arrested Maryam Rajavi, some MEK members burned themselves to death.

The mainstream American media has promoted the MEK even though the MEK has been on the State Department’s list of terrorist organizations since the administration of former President Bill Clinton. A surprising exception was Elizabeth Rubin’s “The Cult of Rajavi” in the New York Times Magazine, June 2003.

After the American government closed the office of the terrorist organization in Washington, DC, the Fox News Channel retained the head of the office as a foreign affairs analyst.

In 2005, Human Rights Watch published “No Exit”, a report warning that MEK members could not leave the cult. MEK leaders have tortured and have killed MEK members who attempted to leave Camp Ashraf, Iraq.

As of August 2009, at least 14 American soldiers have died and 60 have been wounded providing security for MEK shopping convoys to Baghdad.

The American government has funded the MEK via Saudi Arabia. The MEK has raised funds also by creating fake charities (Iran Aid and Muslim Iranian Students’ Society) by collecting donations at airports, and by telling their families that they need tens of thousands of dollars for life-saving surgeries. For example, the American Red Cross withdrew from a fake MEK charity fund raising event after the December 26, 2003 earthquake in Bam, Iran after learning the truth about the MEK. The Iran Policy Committee employs former CIA and military officers to promote the MEK. Hundreds of members of Congress (Democrats and Republicans) have signed statements supporting the MEK terrorists.

The MEK terrorists could not exist without the support of the American government and the ignorance of American voters.

The Neoconservative Cult and the Fragility of American Democracy

January 27, 2010

On January 27, 2005, CounterPunch.org posted the remarks of Seymour Hersh (The New Yorker contributor) at the Stephen Wise Free Synagogue in New York that a neoconservative cult had taken over the American government.  Hersh hoped that future historians would document the fragility of American democracy by explaining how eight or nine neoconservatives were able to overcome easily the bureaucracy, the Congress, and the press.  Stephen Sniegoski, in The Transparent Cabal, has provided a detailed history of how the neoconservative cult achieved the takeover.

Other books have stressed how the neoconservative ideology is contrary to traditional American values:  Reclaiming the American Right (Justin Raimondo), America the Virtuous (Claes Ryn), Where the Right Went Wrong (Patrick Buchanan).

“Memoirs of a Trotskyist” in Neo-conservatism: The Autobiography of an Idea (Irving Kristol) provided a neoconservative account of the origins of neo-conservatism.  Sniegoski noted correctly that the term neoconservative originated with leftists critical of their former comrades for attempting to infiltrate the Democratic and Republican parties.  Thanks to leftists who call neoconservatives the ultra-right and to conservative dupes who think that anyone using a conservative label is a conservative, the neoconservative cancer has spread through the fragile American political body.

The neoconservatives do not represent the only case in American history of a small group attempting to take over America.  The Plot to Seize the White House (Jules Archer) provided a detailed account of General Smedley Butler’s testimony to Congress about a secret plot to overthrow President Franklin Roosevelt.  Butler, a Republican, authored War is a Racket.

Unlike earlier secret plots to take over the American government, Sniegoski explained how it was possible for the neoconservatives to operate as a relatively transparent cabal.  However, he observed that the neoconservatives used a Trojan horse technique to take over the American conservative movement.  The goal of the neoconservatives is to promote endless wars regardless of whether the Democrats or the Republicans are in power.

The neoconservatives do not represent a popular mass movement in America.  Instead, the neoconservatives rely upon the co-operation of other groups.  Sniegoski provided extensive documentation of which groups enabled the neoconservatives.  For example, the Christian Zionists duped their followers into sacrificing money and soldiers.  Zionism originated with the writings of Moses Hess (who helped Karl Marx write The Communist Manifesto, was nicknamed the Communist Rabbi, and who is buried in Israel).  In 1862, Moses Hess published Rome and JerusalemMoses Hess: Prophet of Communism and Zionism (Shlomo Avineri) provided a detailed explanation of the relationship between Communism and Zionism.

The reason for the fragility of American democracy is the failure of many Americans to understand the most basic aspects of the American political system and of their religions.

The Transparent Cabal is an important starting point for understanding how a neoconservative cult opposed to traditional American political and religious values is able to destroy America with endless wars.

Crypto-Jews Duping Christians to Hate Muslims

November 18, 2009

“I was a Jew but now I’m a Christian and think the Muslims and Arabs are curry-smelling Sand monkeys”


Mark Glenn, at “The Ugly Truth” and at “Crescent & Cross”, has been doing an excellent job exposing techniques used to dupe Christians into hating Muslims.


Regardless of whether those who post such hateful comments are Crypto-Jews, Christian Zionists, Zionists, neo-conservatives (neo-Trotskyites), communists, or are from other dishonest groups, the use of this technique has been very successful. Unfortunately, there are large numbers of persons who call themselves Christians, Muslims, Republicans, Conservatives, or members of other groups who are capable of being duped.

Useful Idiots

A supporter of Lenin has noted that even the neo-conservatives (neo-Trotskyites) are using the term useful idiots to describe the technique of communists duping Western useful idiots who call themselves liberals or progressives.

There is a very long history of the successful use of the Crypto-Jew technique. Jews have pretended to convert from Judaism to Christianity and to Islam. There is even an association of Crypto-Jews.

Jewish Hatred of Christians

Currently, Crypto-Jews, Jews, Christian Zionists, Zionists, neo-conservatives (neo-Trotskyites), and others are attempting to convince Christians to hate Muslims. How many Christian soldiers have died in Iraq and in Afghanistan to advance the sick, totalitarian dreams of the admirers of Trotsky?
Patrick Buchanan’s “Whose War?” should be required reading before any Christian enlists in the American military.

Michael Hoffman’s 1,102-page book, Judaism Discovered, should be studied by all Christians.


Some examples of Jewish sacred teachings of hatred for Christians have been posted at:



Crypto-Jews Murdering Christians and Muslims to Steal Palestine

The history of Turkey provides an excellent case study of the success of Crypto-Jews. The Ottoman Empire accumulated large debts before it collapsed. For a history of who financed the debts and of the Young Turks who pretended to become Muslims (including going on the Haj!), read How Jews snatched Palestine?
Then, read about the Armenian genocide in the free book online:
By Christopher Jon Bjerknes
Enlarged Second Edition
Complete 575 page book is available
by clicking here for the free PDF file (3.8 MB)

Intelligent Christian’s Guide to Judaism

November 14, 2009

Paul Sheldon Foote

November 13, 2009

Michael Hoffman’s 1,102-page book, Judaism Discovered: From Its Own Texts–A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit, published by Independent History and Research (revisionisthistory.org) is an outstanding guide for intelligent Christians to understand the relationship between Orthodox Judaism and major religious, political, and economic issues, such as: Judeo-Christian values myth, dispensationalism, dual covenant theology, supersessionism, communism, Zionism, Christian Zionism, neo-conservatives (neo-Trotskyites), and liberation theology.
Many Christians (Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox) do not even realize that the Bibles they use do not contain the same number of books or sequence of books in the Old and New Testaments as the Bibles used by other Christians. Even worse, many Christians believe that the Old Testament contains everything they need to know about Judaism. Hoffman’s masterpiece provides Christians with detailed explanations of the Oral Torah, such as the Babylonian Talmud, accepted by Orthodox Judaism. Christians who choose to remain ignorant of Judaism need to review the historical consequences of Christian ignorance, including: Sever Plocker’s article “Stalin’s Jews” (posted at ynetnews.com) and Christopher Jon Bjerknes’ free book online The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians.
The Soviet Union exploited Christian ignorance of Christian doctrines by promoting liberation theology, creating Christian or peace organizations (Christian Peace Conference), and by sending representatives to the World Council of Churches meetings. See “The Kremlin’s Religious Crusade” by Ion Mihai Pacepa, FrontPageMagazine.com, June 30, 2009.
In spite of sanitized translations of the Old Testament in Christian Bibles, such as using servant instead of slave, intelligent readers of the Old Testament understand that there is nothing sacred about many of the values expressed in the Old Testament, including the Jewish practice of murdering every man, woman, and child when they invaded the lands of others. An atheist Web site, SkepticsAnnotedBible.com, contains detailed annotations of the Bible, Koran, and of the Book of Mormon. It is a sad commentary on Christians and Muslims when atheists understand their sacred books better than most Christians and Muslims do.
What is a Gentile? I am amazed at how many Christians cannot answer this question. They have read in the Old Testament about Adam and Eve and assume that they have descended from Adam and Eve. If this were true, then we are all Jews. Orthodox Jews do not believe this. Jesus preached to Jews and was crucified at the request of Jewish leaders for doing so. While New Testament Christians understand that the new covenant replaced old covenants, Christian Zionists have promoted dual covenants and dispensationalism. An example of a book covering the issues related to supersessionism is Michael J. Vlach’s The Church As a Replacement of Israel: An Analysis of Supersessionism. The Apostle Paul shocked many early Christians by preaching to Gentiles and by not requiring circumcision for Gentiles in order to become Christians. Christians who read Hoffman’s book will understand why.
On March 2, 2006, The Jerusalem Post had to report that John Hagee and Jerry Falwell denied the claim reported earlier that they believed that Jews could go to heaven without accepting Jesus. To understand those who call themselves Christian Zionists, read Shlomo Aviner’s book, Moses Hess: Prophet of Communism and Zionism. Moses Hess worked with Karl Marx on drafts of The Communist Manifesto. Early communists called Moses Hess the “Communist Rabbi”. Moses Hess’ 1862 book, Rome and Jerusalem, outlined a communist strategy to destroy Christian culture in Europe while providing a refuge for Jewish communists in Palestine. Moses Hess is buried in Israel.
If you accept the Orthodox Jewish beliefs about the distinction between Jews and Gentiles, then it would not be possible to convert to Orthodox Judaism. Amazingly, many of those who claim to be Jews today have pagan ancestors who converted to Judaism (Shlomo Sand and Yael Lotan’s book: The Invention of the Jewish People). The combination of the chutzpah of the descendants of King Bulan’s pagans of Eastern Europe who call their opponents anti-Semites plus the stupidity and dishonesty of the Christian Zionists has served as the basis for endless wars. As documented by David Chagall, in his book Target: Special Victims of the Holocaust, Nazi Germany did not target Semitic (Sephardic) Jews.
Michael Hoffman and Moshe Lieberman’s book, The Israeli Holocaust Against the Palestinians, documented war crimes against the Palestinians made possible by America’s political leaders and media portraying the Palestinians as less than human. As noted by atheists, such as at EvilBible.com, the Bible contains many claims by Jews that God told the Jews to murder every man, woman, and child in lands the Jews wanted for themselves: “The so called ‘God’ of the Bible makes Osama Bin Laden look like a Boy Scout.” As documented by Michael Hoffman, the Talmud is even worse (see also: TalmudBlasphemy.com).
In a desperate attempt to steal Palestine from the Palestinians, the debate has turned to searches for lost tribes and to DNA, inspired by books such as: Jon Entine’s Abraham’s Children: Race, Identity, and the DNA of the Chosen People and Yaakov Kleiman’s DNA and Tradition: The Genetic Link to the Ancient Hebrews. For those who want to support your claims, submit your DNA to 23andMe.com and post your maternal and paternal haplogroup results. As noted at 23andMe.com: “all humans are more than 99% similar to each other genetically”. Anyone who accepts the Old Testament accounts of Jews murdering every man, woman, and child—except for Gentile virgins taken as Jewish wives—will have problems pursuing genetic claims.
Michael Hoffman’s 1,102-page book, Judaism Discovered: From Its Own Texts–A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit, should be read by every intelligent Christian. “Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.”—2 Timothy 2:15

Mitt Romney: Brainwashed by Zionists

October 24, 2009

Paul Sheldon Foote

October 23, 2009

Mitt Romney’s “Iran: Biggest Threat Since Soviets” (October 22, 2009) provides evidence that he is not only a RINO (Republican In Name Only) but also is brainwashed by Zionists. [1]

In 1966, while a member of The University of Michigan College Republican Club, I organized a student rally for Mitt Romney’s father, George Romney, in Ann Arbor, Michigan.  I spoke with Mitt Romney’s parents at Republican campaign events.  After Governor George Romney’s trip to Vietnam, he blundered in 1967 in his presidential campaign by saying that the military had brainwashed him. [2]

While I volunteered and served in the American Army in Vietnam, Mitt Romney, a chickenhawk, obtained draft deferments as a Mormon minister of religion serving in France. [3]

In “A Special Place in Hell: Mitt Romney, blood libel, and that old time Jew hate”, an Israeli newspaper attacked Mitt Romney for announcing his candidacy for President at the Henry Ford Museum in Dearborn, Michigan.  The complaint about Henry Ford was:

“Named for America’s greatest anti-Semite. “

“Named for a man revered by Adolf Hitler, who awarded him the Grand Service Cross of the Supreme Order of the German Eagle. Named for the U.S. publisher of the ‘Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion’ and ‘The International Jew: the World’s foremost problem.’” [4]

To pay for his sins, Mitt Romney lies for the Zionists.  America’s defense budget dwarfs the military spending of the world.  Iran’s size and military strength is tiny compared with that of the former Soviet Union.

Mitt Romney lies, too, about Holocaust deniers.  When Iran hosted a conference on the Holocaust, its television stations showed interviews of Jewish speakers who went to Iran for the conference and who explained on television about their relatives who had been killed during the Holocaust.

Now, Mitt Romney needs to pay for his sins against the hundreds of millions of Christians and others murdered or had their lives destroyed by the communists.  [5]

He can start by reading about Moses Hess (“Communist Rabbi”), who worked with Karl Marx on drafts of The Communist Manifesto, who wrote his own book on Zionism in 1862, and who is buried in Israel.  [6]

Then, he can research about the tens of millions of Christians murdered by Zionists in the Soviet Union. [7]

Mitt Romney is unfit to serve as a President of the United States.  While I supported his father, I did not vote for Mitt Romney in the 2008 Republican Presidential Primary Election and will never vote for him.

[1] http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=34061

[2] http://www.boston.com/news/globe/magazine/articles/2006/08/13/the_lessons_of_the_father/

[3] http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2008/specials/romney/articles/part1_side_2/?page=1

[4] http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/825372.html

[5] The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression


[6] Moses Hess: Prophet of Communism and Zionism


[7] “Stalin’s Jews”